Literature and the Writing Process:
taken from: http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/english/wwwroot2/TA/hyperteach/PDFs/lit_poetry.pdf
Summary & Description vs. Analysis & ArgumentSummary: tells what is happening; summarizes plot; basically paraphrases
the poem in plain (nonpoetic) language
Ex: The speaker in “The Flea” compares having sex to the bloodmingling
bite of a flea, in order to convince his beloved that sex would
not be a big deal.
Description: may take note of particular poetic devices, but makes no
argumentative comment on those devices
Ex: Donne creates an extended metaphor by comparing the mingling of
bodies in sex to the mingling of blood in a flea bite. He also uses
religious imagery by comparing the flea to a “temple” in which the
speaker and the beloved are “cloistered.”
What is missing? --any ANALYSIS of HOW these poetic devices function in
the poem and so of WHY the author might have chosen to use them
Analysis: asks and answers how poetic devices function in the poem, what
they signify or mean
Ex: By creating an extended metaphor in which the bite of a flea
represents the act of sex, the speaker suggests to his beloved that sex
is as insignificant, harmless, and sinless as the tiny flea bite. He also
suggests that the holiness of their physical union is already contained in
the flea, for he refers to it as a “temple” in which they are “cloistered.”
Argument: uses analytical points to make an arguable claim about the poem
as a whole
Ex: In John Donne’s “The Flea,” the speaker tries to convince his
beloved to have sex with him by comparing the act of sex to the
insignificant, sinless bite of a flea. But the speaker tries to have it both
ways: at the same time that he uses the flea as a symbol of sinless
insignificance, he also tries to convince his beloved that their union
would be as grand and holy as the flea, which he compares to a
“temple.”
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment